INTRODUCTION

 DECEMBER 2007

Welcome to this page dedicated to inkjet printers  and ink---  the NO BALONEY review and info page. Almost EVERY commercial and even non-commercial printer review and inkjet info shortchanges  the consumer- and  ignores long term usage problems, and practical application  of printers  and ink.

THIS PAGE LOOKS  AT EVERYTHING beyond the superficial claims and typical shallow reviews- typical reviews that GREATLY  MISLEAD users and buyers of inkjet printers and ink.

New info on the new season of Canon printers is down the page, in which I compare with last year's superlative models.

UPDATE NOTE:

One complaint about my site that I saw on another site reviewing REVIEW SITES was that this site did not reflect the newest printers in the market.

That is correct.

And there is a reason for this:

I am still using printers made a couple of years ago-- and the cost of using these older printers, including the EASE of using these printers is MUCH BETTER than the newest models.

Why?

1) Canon generally makes the best printers for consumers, and this has been the case for several years. My older Canon printers work fine, and I have not been able to find ANY reason for replacing them. New printers DO NOT WORK BETTER than my original ip model printers. PERIOD. There are reasons why the new printers are WORSE (keep reading). Any change in resolution or color rendition is absolutely un-detectable.

2) Canon began changing the STYLE of the INK CARTRIDGES so that all new printers use ELECTRONIC CHIPPED cartridges. This is how Epson for years has for years made the use of aftermarket cartridges extremely difficult- and thus EXPENSIVE for the consumer. Canon has followed suit-- and thus, using inexpensive aftermarket cartridges requires transferring the chip from an original Canon cart to the aftermarket cart, and half the time this does not even work as claimed.

3) Very good aftermarket ink for 6BCI style cartridges (older style) is easily found, at a FRACTION of the price for an official Canon cart. Further, BULK ink, of even better quality at even lower cost is easily found, and one can REFILL either Canon or aftermarket carts to great success--- EVEN IN NEW PRINTER CARTS like 8CLI style carts (new Canon printers). Contrary to rumors-- THERE IS NO INCREASED PRINTER RISK IN USING GOOD BULK INK OR GOOD AFTERMARKET CARTS.

4) Quality and use of new printers is NOT IMPROVED over printers like ip3000, ip4000, ip5000, ip6000.

5) My current recommendation is to find a like-new ip3000, ip4000, ip5000, ip6000, or ip6000D on Craigslist or ebay and continue to use the 6BCI type cartridges for which aftermarket alternatives remain easily obtained. These are EXCELLENT printers in terms of quality, speed, reliability, and certainly MUCH BETTER in regards to good economy of ink. In fact, I just bought a NEW IN THE BOX ip3000 printer- December 2007. I wouldn't trade this for ANY new model Canon (or any other brand) printer if given to me for free.

Neil's MAIN Suggestions SUMMARY:

1) Don't go broke buying overpriced inkjet refills. We have now found suppliers who actually offer ink cartridges at fair prices. Nearly EVERY retailer, and most internet sources we have found charges at least 300% to 600%  times the price of these companies. We've tested their inks- they work wonderfully, and a fraction of the cost of the OEM ink you pay through the nose for. These are NOT paid endorsements in any way, just passing on our research in this area, more details below. We've tested several custom formula third party inks against Canon (and some Epson) factory ink cartridges and there is little reason- except for greed- that anyone should be paying $20- $60 to refill their inkjet printers. It is obscene. Details below on this page.

But what about LIFE SPAN of cheap second party inks? SEE THIS PAGE for my comments then read the pages in Ink Jet Ink  then read this page on COMPARING INKS

2) For large quantities of printing by professionals and artists, REFILL your cartridges for a fraction of store bought carts. Details below- DON'T use off the shelf refill kits, however. Your ink will cost you1/20th the price of regular refills.  There are Continuous Flow Systems available- these come with their own set of problems however, again  details below...

3) If you need a printer, I suggest any Canon desktop regular printer at the mid-price range, $79- $99  or more that takes at least 5 cartridges. i.e. models ip3600, ip4600, ip4700, or any pro model.  Do not buy a printer that uses one black and one combo Tri-color cartridge.

Good older printers may occasionally be found such as ip3000, ip4000, ip5000, ip6000, or ip6000D. Make sure you can test them as working perfectly- these all take the same cartridges (6BCI) as the previous printers: i560, i860, i960, i900D, i9100, i9900.  Make sure if you buy an older printer from someone- it prints a perfect test print.

REGARDING newer Canon Cameras and printers: Canon printers BEAT ALL in my mind- Canon excels at imaging- Camera and Printers.

I do NOT  work for Canon.

Avoid any printer under $79unless you are a broke student or just need something cheap for very occasional use, or you really are not picky about the quality you get..

4) You can refill your laser printers with toner yourself, recycling the cartridge, for 1/5th the cost of just replacing the whole cartridge. This is fairly easy in most cases. Details at the bottom of this page.

5) I have tried Continuous Flow systems for Canon printers. Sorry, but I did not have long term success. They all break down after a MAXIMUM of 3 months. This is due to the design of Canon cartridges that just do not allow permanent use of CIS systems. Sorry, I wish it was otherwise, but it isn't. They are more trouble than they are worth, even if you get them to work in the beginning.

6) DO NOT expect your paper inkjet prints to look EXACTLY like the preview on your monitor. Both flat LCD monitors and regular more common tube CRT monitors PROJECT light to your eyes. Paper inkjet prints REFLECT light to your eyes-- color transmission is very different between a monitor and a paper print. Even with the best calibration- and most people don't even approach this- a print and you monitor will differ significantly in worst cases, and somewhat in best cases. Adjust your printer color settings from what you see on actual prints. You can calibrate your monitor to get close, but chances are, for the best color rendition, look at the print and adjust accordingly.

*                    *                    *

Why is this a BRAIN review? Because often reviews are written (even by third parties) which are done poorly, and with motives that may reflect conflict of interests. This is an honest evaluation done by yours truly, seeking the best quality and results for reasonable cost.

AND I USE ALL OF THIS STUFF- extensively all of the time, printing hundreds of photos every month and THOUSANDS of documents and photos every year.

OFTEN, magazine and web reviews are inaccurate- why? The people writing the reviews are COLUMNISTS, and rarely use this stuff at a full time level. They make their conclusions based on short term use, limited use, and frequently don't have the eye of a pro. They may have a slanted bias for or against a printer for unexplained reasons. THEY ACCEPT PAID ADVERTISING, duh-  what do you think this does to accurate opinions, eh? I've seen all kinds of BAD reviews regarding printers, as well as cameras. Take any review in a commercial site or magazine with a grain of salt. I use my printers ALL the time, and have for years.

I recently looked at the CNET reviews of inkjet printers-- TOTAL CRAP. This is really bad information to be giving people per their ratings, and I genuinely feel sorry for anyone buying a printer based on these kinds of reviews. Irrelevant and inconsistent, and things CNET editors judged relevant----OOOOO@! it actually makes me disgusted. The editors at CNET are morons to publish these ratings- but then, they accept commercial advertising. BEWARE!! of reviews on commercial sites!

The main players in the regular inkjet and inkjet photo printer consumer market are Epson, HP, Canon, and Lexmark. What I looked at was detail, correct color, speed, price, reputation, reliability and ease of use. I spoke with representatives from the companies, dealers, and used the equipment. I did this on my own then compared some reliable expert reviews, and found that my results were in keeping with other reviews.

Any of today's inkjet printers do a good job for general non-too-picky use, and if you only use your printer occasionally, most printers will suffice. 

But, if you've got a real eye for quality and reliability-- WATCH OUT. For the same money you will spend on a greatly lesser printer, you can get a printer way ahead of the crowd.

GENERAL NEW INFORMATION

Given all things equal,  SIX color (5 colors plus black) printers are superior for lifelike and accurate color over the FOUR color (three colors plus black) printers. This difference may not be noticeable or important however to many people. For snapshots where color imagery accuracy is not that important, it is a small difference. You will pay more for six color systems than four color systems, as well as for the ink.  Look at the sample photos at the store- if you can't tell the difference, and absolute color accuracy is not important to you- factor this into your printer purchase/use decision. If you've got a decent eye, and you do care and want the best- go 6 color.

There are now 7 and 8 color printers out there--  in my opinion, forget it. This is pure overkill. 6 color printers will now deliver the same quality as a regular color photo lab. Add 2 more colors- what... do you drive a Humvee to get to 7-11 and get your groceries also- when a Honda will get 3 times the gas mileage, easier to park, a fraction of the cost? Two more colors add more problems to deal with, that you really don't need. The payoff is minimal, if it exists at all.

As far as ink goes, we have now found outlets on the web that sell printer model specific outstanding quality ink at a truly reasonable cost-- 1/6th the price of OEM ink or manufacturers ink elsewhere. It's ink at the price IT SHOULD BE.  See details below. If you are replacing inkjet cartridges more than once every year (ha ha) you should not be wasting money supporting greedy printing companies by shelling out $50 for an ounce of ink. !!! How Canon, and Epson, and all the rest rationalize charging outrageous prices for pennies worth of ink is a story in corporate greed in itself. Okay, they make good printers-- charge fair prices for ink already. 

INK AND PRINT LIFE

Okay, this discussion comes up immediately when dealing with THIRD PARTY INK SUPPLIERS. Don't make the assumption that anything other than name brand ink will last a fraction of the life span predicted by $12 -$50 name brand ink cartridge makers. 

There are ENORMOUS variables in what constitutes print life. Conditions, ink itself, brand, paper, and how all of these interact. There is NO ONE ANSWER, and it is a bad assumption to make that if you use the printer's ink and paper, you will get the best results. Of course, that is what Canon, Epson, and HP would want you to believe. God bless them, they've made great at-home photo printing possible- but that's no excuse to gouge us for ink.

I've been using cheap Epson Glossy Photo paper ($20 for 120 8.5 X 11" sheets at COSTCO) for years. I use third party CUSTOM FORMULA INK (not the generic off the shelf one-ink-fits-all from Office Depot), which costs about 1/6 - 1/20 the price of name brand ink depending on the packaging (4 oz bulk bottles cheaper, obviously). I keep my prints hung on the wall with scotch tape in a brightly sunlit room. I have yet to see and print fading or discoloration in 2 years of any of my s900 or i960 prints. Maybe in ten  years. The Canon FORMULA is expected to last 25-27 years before ink degeneration- I would say this is very optimistic.

If you need DETAILED information on print life, then you need to do serious homework. Don't take mainstream media propaganda (PC magazine for example) as God's word. Think about WHO buys advertising in their magazine....Their own article on this subject was VERY limited in it's sensationalist testing. Start here instead: http://www.wilhelm-research.com/index.html  

then read this: The MYTH of non-permanence of inkjet prints: http://www.wilhelm-research.com/pdf/Digital_Photo_Pro_May_2004/Digital_Photo_Pro_May_2004.pd

If you are printing PROFESSIONALLY and selling your prints-- DO YOUR HOMEWORK.  Both Canon and Epson now sell pro printers that use archival inks.

If you are a home consumer use- use regular dyebase inks. They'll look better, printer cheaper, and last plenty long enough provided you don't put your prints in direct sunlight-  even REAL color lab photos won't last in the sun- duh.

There are four companies whom I have bought ink for my Canon printer at fair prices, and I've had excellent results with each. Each company offers some unique advantage for your situation, so look at them all, and see my detailed notes about INK below. 

I've spoken with the actual manufacturer who supplies these distributors with their inks- very honest, well informed people. I have no doubts- none- about the integrity of their products and their equivalent quality to name brand inks.

PIGMENT ARCHIVAL INKS: All consumer inkjet printers start off using DYE based inks. Archival PIGMENT inks are made, and offer better life-- at higher price. I personally don't use them. 

 Do lots of homework if pigment inks interest you.

Printing success is really a BRAIN thing- click it on

NEXT SECTION "Ink Test Update" CLICK THIS

and Inkjet Stuff Home

Off to: The Amazing Brain Music Adventure